Submitted by Jamie Flannick (not verified) on Fri, 04/02/2021 - 13:22
Great points in the article and follow-on comment. Curious about a key assumption - Tech Innovation has been seen as a central driver of GDP growth - does this hold with the next iteration(s) of software and hardware? Or like in chip design, has GDP growth hit its own “Moore’s Law” and unable to bail-out the sort of debt the US is accruing. Additionally, is there a populous-proof policy mechanism that would actually allow the US to strategically plan beyond 1-2 years?
Image CAPTCHA
Get new captcha!
Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.